Overcoming Regulatory Hurdles: Decree No. 116 and Vietnam's Auto Industry
Circular No. 03 and Criticism
Under Circular No. 03 issued by the Ministry of Transport (MoT) in January 2018, which guides the implementation of import-related regulations prescribed in Decree No. 116, the procedure of conducting emission and safety tests for each model of automobile class (or two if the importer asks for one model for the emission test and the other for the safety test) has been criticized as meaningless and a waste of time and money. According to the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Vietnam, the testing process could take up to two months and cost up to $10,000 each time. Many auto firms have complained about Vietnam’s unnecessary red tape regarding VTA certificates for imported automobiles, blaming it for the scarcity of CBU units over the past two months.
Shifting Trends Among Manufacturers
However, the wind’s direction seems to have changed. Manufacturers including Honda, Ford, GM, Mitsubishi, and Nissan, who import vehicles from Thailand to Vietnam, have reportedly submitted the VTA form to the MoT and received the ministry’s approval. Honda Vietnam brought home a shipment of more than 2,000 unused CBU units, including models like Jazz, Accord, CR-V, and Civic. More than 1,000 units are under customs clearance at SPCT – Hiep Phuoc port in Ho Chi Minh City, with the remaining units sent to Dinh Vu port in northern Haiphong city for customs clearance.
Several automobile firms are restarting their import of automobiles from Thailand after the Thai government approved the certification as required in Decree No. 116, the Vietnam Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (VAMA) reported. VAMA noted that some countries have had to change their laws to issue VTA certificates for units to be exported to Vietnam, as it is not a type of certificate available in many exporting countries.
Production Resumption Conditions
A well-informed source from a Hanoi-based auto firm indicated that overseas automakers will only reset the production of vehicles for the Vietnamese market once Vietnam approves the certificates granted by overseas competent agencies or organizations. It takes some 20-30 days to manufacture four-wheeled vehicles. Previous CBU shipments would normally arrive in Vietnam around two months after production if import and tax procedures went smoothly. With the strict import regulations set for unused vehicles in Decree No. 116 and Circular No. 03, the timing of such shipments to Vietnam is now unpredictable.
Market Impact and Stock Units
The automobile market witnessed a scarcity of imported vehicles, which is expected to continue in March. Units sold in these months are those imported in 2017 and left in stock because many overseas manufacturers had to cancel the manufacturing of units for the Vietnamese market from December to March.
Hyundai Thanh Cong's Production Goals
Hyundai Thanh Cong Auto Vietnam JSC is enhancing domestic production in line with the national automobile development strategy. Domestic production now contributes to 80% of the firm’s total vehicles. The joint venture aims to lift domestic output to 95% in the near future, Le Ngoc Duc, general director of the firm, said.
Vinfast and Foreign Investments
Besides Vietnamese auto brand Vinfast’s $3.5 billion project with a capacity of 500,000 vehicles per year, invested by Vietnam’s leading real estate developer Vingroup, the domestic auto market is placing hope on foreign-invested firms like Toyota and Mitsubishi Motors. Toyota Vietnam is considering restarting the assemblage of its Fortuner model if imports encounter difficulties.
Mitsubishi Motors' Plans
In a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Vuong Dinh Hue in mid-January, Kozo Shiraji, executive vice president of Mitsubishi Motors Corp., reaffirmed Mitsubishi’s plan to invest in a second auto factory in Vietnam, totaling $250 million. The firm is currently considering the factory’s location. Designed with a capacity of 30,000-50,000 units per year, the factory is expected to be operational by 2020.
Reference: Vietnam Investment Review